🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.