🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and undue limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive attacks on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being defended by referring to last week's terrible anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you likely cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable anti-Jewish attack to try to suppress a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this effort. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for holding placards opposing mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.